The mainstream media is declaring war on YouTube and they are escalating dramatically and quickly.

Of course, many of you are probably familiar with the Vox ad-pocalypse.

Many channels got wiped out, got their monetization removed. I mean, they can't make money anymore.

Because of Vox. One of these channels made videos of like nature sounds.

Could you not? Historical channels, teachers, etc.

And Vox doubled down after this with a letter demanding more.

We saw an article from CNET where they targeted advertisers that appeared on gaming channels

because they felt the gamers were sometimes angry and it worked.

People like Jeremy Hamley reportedly lost sponsors.

But now the controversy is escalating because Philip DeFranco is being sort of targeted here.

Now, I don't want to get all conspiratorial but what you're seeing on this, on my screen right now

is a story from the New York Times where you can see a bunch of different YouTubers.

Now, I want to make sure I point out you have some intellectuals, Milton Friedman,

you have Jimmy Kimmel, for instance, being associated with YouTube, just YouTube right now.

But you'll notice Philip DeFranco. Now, why does this bother Philip DeFranco and many other

YouTubers and why would I consider this an attack on YouTube? Certainly, Jimmy Kimmel is resilient.

He's fine. Some of the other intellectuals who are not far right or alt right don't care about YouTube.

But what do you think happens then when you scroll down on this story?

As I scroll down, it says, first, Caleb Kane was a college dropout looking for direction.

He turned to YouTube. We scroll down and many images start to disappear.

Soon, he was pulled into a far right universe watching thousands of videos filled with conspiracy

theories, misogyny and racism. You'll notice now that only a few channels, about half of the

...