meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Politics Unpacked

McSweeney: What We Learned

Politics Unpacked

Anna Covell

News, Politics, News & Politics

4.11.4K Ratings

🗓️ 28 April 2026

⏱️ 12 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

After two blockbuster sessions of the Commons committee looking into the appointment and vetting of Peter Mandelson, what did we learn from the evidence of former Foreign Office mandarin Sir Phillip Barton and former Downing Street chief of staff Morgan McSweeney?


Daniel Finkelstein is joined by Tom McTague and Ollie Cole to find out where this leaves Keir Starmer.


Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Hello, this is Hugo Rifkind. Our regular columnists have had the day off today because we've been

0:04.3

listening to Kirste Starrmer's former Chief of Staff, Morgan McSweeney, giving evidence to MPs about the

0:08.8

appointment of Peter Mandelson as US ambassador. It was a moment of major jeopardy for the Prime Minister

0:14.8

and a rare opportunity to hear from the man who masterminded Labour's rise to power.

0:20.4

So, to unpack what McSweeney said, I'm handing over to Danny Finkelstein from our sister podcast

0:25.5

How to Win an Election, who is joined by Tom McTagg from the new statesman and Olly Cole

0:30.6

from The Times.

0:35.8

We've been listening to two box office foreign affairs Committee sessions this morning over the Peter Mandelson affair.

0:43.0

I'm Daniel Finkelstein.

0:44.3

First there was Philip Barton, the former head of the foreign office, who said he was told to get on with the appointment of Lord Mandelson.

0:51.9

Then there was Morgan McSweeney.

0:53.5

The Prime Minister's former Chief of Staff admitted making mistakes and said he assumed wrongly that Mandelson was telling the truth about his links to Geoffrey Epstein and then called the Revelations a knife through his soul. We're going to get into this with Tom McTay, the editor of the New Statesman and Olly Cole, but Olli, you're in the studio

1:11.3

with me now. What did you make of what we've just heard? So I think there's a lot of interesting

1:16.6

insights into how those decisions were made, both in the number 10 operation and also in terms of

1:24.3

what was received by the Foreign Office. We heard earlier from Philip Barton about how, you know, essentially he saw this as a pretty, you know, extraordinary appointment

1:33.0

in terms of how quickly it all needed to be done, you know, how the timelines came about,

1:37.8

the fact that the vetting wasn't done until after the appointment of, or the announcement

1:42.0

of Peter Mendelsoelson as US ambassador.

1:45.0

But you've got essentially there two sessions which I think everyone on either side of this question over

1:51.0

whether Kier-Stama can sort of survive the day without getting an ethics probe and this and the other,

1:57.0

can take something from it. I think, you know, Philip Barton managed to sort of differentiate between

2:04.4

the different types of pressure that the Foreign Office felt they were under. Morgan McSweeney

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Anna Covell, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Anna Covell and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.