17 states and the president of the United States have joined the great state of Texas ensuing the

battlegrounds over election irregularities in the Supreme Court.

This after there was another lawsuit brought up to the Supreme Court regarding the irregularities

in Pennsylvania.

And the host of this show has been asked to argue both of those cases before the

Supreme Court. This is Verdict with Ted Cruz. Welcome back to Verdict with Ted Cruz. I'm Michael

Knowles and I should clarify, I have not been asked to argue those cases

before the Supreme Court. I have offered my services. Ken Paxton in Texas has not returned my calls.

Actually, it was Senator Cruz, who's been asked. Senator, there's a lot to get into right here.

The last time we spoke, we discussed in Pennsylvania this case regarding the irregularities there

and the possible violation of the Pennsylvania State Constitution.

At that time, I believe you had not yet been asked to argue the case before the court.

The Supreme Court then rejected that appeal anyway.

Now we've got this other case from Texas.

What is going on?

Why have you been asked?

I suppose because of your great experience, arguing before the Supreme Court.

But how did this all come to pass?

Well, sure.

Let's start with the Pennsylvania case.

When we last did the podcast, the Pennsylvania case was pending.

And the lawyers for the plaintiffs there, so the plaintiffs in the

...