Hi, I'm Jeff, and this is a 10 minute Bible hour podcast.

The episode you're about to listen to is part two of a topic that Matt introduced in episode

255.

So if you haven't listened to that one, you should listen to that one first before moving on to this bonus episode.

Speaking of bonus, here's some bonus intro music. Welcome back my friends I'm Matt. This is the 10 minute Bible hour

podcast and what we're digging into right now once again is the question of

whether or not Matthew 1127 was in the

original text or if maybe as some have suggested in the last few centuries some later

editor came in and added this verse, this phrase from Jesus, to bolster the Gospel of Matthew's

effectiveness and clarity on really nailing the Orthodox Christian position on the nature

of the Father and the Son and how they relate together.

So where we left off was we were on our way over to a verse where actually there is a reasonable case to be made that a later addition may have occurred that was

trying to advance the idea that Jesus is the son of God. If you go to Acts 837 right now, you're going to see something really interesting depending on what kind of Bible you use.

Physically, if you have a Bible, grab it right now.

Flip over to Act 8.

I normally ask you to do that, but if you got one, step away from your sweaty treadmill and pull out the

Bible that you no doubt keep in your unitard pocket and just take a look.

Okay, Acts 836 as they were traveling along the road they came to some water and

the eunuchs said,

oh there's a eunuch in it by the way.

Look here's water, why shouldn't I be baptized?

Oh, there is no acts 837.

...