I read through part of an article this week before I got interrupted and that's always a credible start isn't it?

I saw a tweet about an article that had part of the headline in it and you can trust me I totally know what I'm talking about but I do think I got the gist on this one.

The article was about this year

being the year that had the most credible UFO sightings in history and I didn't

get far enough to see what the metric they were going with to determine what is a credible

UFO sighting or what is a UFO but they had some pictures and I was like yeah I don't know what that is I don't know what that is and

that some pictures of some other things that you know we're all over Twitter but it was like oh that's some

kind of thing that got totally explained to the rocket test launch or I don't

remember what they all were but it's fun to watch that stuff pop up. And I have to think that the number of occurrences

or claims are confusing, difficult to interpret

video that could be read as a UFO sighting.

I gotta think that's up because everybody just has a camera

attached to their hand all the time now.

So you're gonna see more of those claims played out.

Plus we have a mechanism to circulate all of it,

but that's not really what I'm talking about here.

What I'm driving at is this.

All of those seem fun and nothing more than interesting to try to figure out how the hoax worked

or where the misunderstanding was.

But if there was a really legitimate

UFO or even alien encounter kind of thing that happened,

I think the most fascinating thing about that at least for me

...