You are saying to the human race for the first time an official intelligence

representative is saying publicly we are not alone.

We're definitely not alone. Absolutely the data points empirically that we're not alone.

Yeah. This is one of the things that the sci-fi writers and filmmakers of the past got wrong.

I think they got a lot right but one thing they got wrong is they always assumed

that going through all these different hypothetical scenarios of when we make contact with aliens

or when aliens come to the United States. They always assumed that no matter what else happens,

it would be a big deal to the people on earth. Like it'd be the biggest deal of all.

And they got that wrong because a lot of people don't care.

Yeah, the US intelligence official that comes out on the record and says yes we have these vehicles.

We have them. Everyone's like, oh, cares. I don't care. I don't care. I want someone to explain to me.

It doesn't mean that you can always find a reason to doubt anyone when they're making a claim of

something you haven't seen for yourself. But when you're assessing the veracity of someone's claim,

you look at a couple of things. You look at their resume, their own background to see if there's

any reason they would know this. And this is not a credentialism thing. What I mean is,

if someone's saying, oh, I have seen top secret classified documents proving this,

well, now the credentials do matter because I want to know, are you the sort of person who would

even have access to that? And if you aren't, then I'm not sure that I probably won't believe.

In this case, he is the kind of person who would have access to that information. So you want to

look at that. And the other thing you want to assess is, what is in it for this person? If they're

lying, what could they gain from lying? But as we talk about, there are a lot of other evidence

and mechanos compiled other UFOs citing videos. And I don't think I have any context on any of

...