Thank you so much for joining us.

Absolutely good to be here.

All right.

So let me start with this question which I think a lot of people are wondering about and

it's a semantics question. You know when you talk about everything

that's happening in this world and sort of like the push like in different pockets like

the net zero agenda the 15 minute cities the a bunch of the green policies, the Central Bank digital

currencies, they're all different manifestations and people say well this will

lead to communism or some people say well no that doesn't fit the definition of communism. Or some people say, well, no, that doesn't fit the definition of communism.

It leads to socialism.

It leads to globalism.

I feel like there's a big like semantics battle that I feel like it misses the greater underlying point.

What do you make of that?

What's your opinion?

Well, I think everyone's true.

And everyone has a point to that because ultimately what it really is is total control.

And so we can call it whatever we

want is it exactly the model of communism probably not but is communism a

structure that will help move them towards a place of absolute collectivism, where the masses

are trapped into a group think, such that we will no longer have our individual intelligence and create solutions to the problem and

we'll just ultimately surrender to their daily schedule and living within 15 minute cities

and having to stand six feet apart if that's what they say.

...