The New York Times reports that there was discussion of the president invoking

martial law and conducting a new election under the auspices of the military.

Thankfully, President Trump has denied it.

You'll hear why that would be unconstitutional on the Dershore show.

Today we talk about a constitutional apocalypse.

Apparently, according to the New York Times, there are reports that the president was considering, he's denied

it, was considering invoking martial law and rerunning the election with guns out and the military controlling the election.

We know that General Flynn, remember him, the former National Security

advisor who was prosecuted and then got a pardon, who's served the country greatly in the past.

According to his appearance on Newsmack,

Newsmacks, Mr Flynn pushed for Mr. Trump

to impose martial law and deploy the military to rerun the election.

At one point in the meeting on Friday, Mr. Trump asked about that idea.

That's according to the New York Times.

President Trump has denied any interest in imposing martial law,

but it's out there. I'm getting lots and lots of emails. Here's an email just an hour ago.

Quote, I'm hearing from an indirect credible source that Podes, the president, will invoke

the Insirection Act this week, replace Mark Meadows and General Flynn, with General Flynn, and Sidney Powell will be named as a special prosecutor on election

fraud. The email asks me to check it out. I have no way of checking it out except to expose it and talk about it on the Dersh show.

So let's talk about it. This is an issue in which I am genuinely an expert without, you know, blowing

my own horn. I have written books and articles about national emergencies. I started writing about this in 1970 when I was a

consultant to Pierre Trudeau and the Canadian government when they invoked the

...