One thing I do want to ask you because tell me if this is something that you'd be concerned about moving forward.

Go ahead.

Malik neighbors had a very good week too.

I mean obviously had the big drop, we all understand that.

That caught across them the game.

But outside of that he was very very good but he was also

historically targeted yeah 18 of the 27 yeah he saw malique neighbors more than 60% of the team targets he is the by the number in total was 66.7%

well think about that for a second

Malik neighbors especially for you fantasy owners malique neighbors was targeted a say okay I don't really understand it can you explain to me better I'll explain it this way

No other receiver in the last eight years in the NFL in any game had been targeted at that kind of clip.

Yeah. In fact, he was 67%.

No player in the last eight years has been targeted 60% of the time.

So he was historic in terms of how often he was targeted. I asked the question because I am

formulating an opinion on this and you are the football guy. Yeah.

Isn't that like kind of an unhealthy thing?

Can that be a sustainable thing?

Meaning for him physically?

No, no, like this can't be a trend from a schematic standpoint.

Yes. Yeah, yeah. Look, if it can... a trend from a schematic standpoint. Yes!

Yeah, yeah.

Look, if it contends and it continues and it becomes the trend,

it just becomes easy to defend, right?

...