Happening now a major test of presidential power, the Supreme Court case that could reshape the federal government.

And bipartisan pressure more lawmakers want Defense Secretary Pete Haxeth to release footage of a second strike that killed survivors on an alleged drug boat.

And speaking out, Marjor Taylor Green's first interview, since she

announced her resignation from Congress, she reveals what Republicans say about the president

behind closed doors. Plus, breaking news, a hostile takeover bid. Paramount now going to war after

Netflix struck a deal to buy Warner Brothers Discovery.

Disappointed. President Trump criticizes his Ukrainian counterpart as Donald Trump Jr.

says his father could abandon peace talks altogether. And the NFL playoff picture gets clear.

The major comeback by my Buffalo Bills in the snow.

Welcome to our viewers here in the United States and around the world.

I'm Wolf Blitzer with Pamela Brown, and you're in the Situation Room.

Happening now, we begin at the U.S. Supreme Court where President Trump's executive power faces a major test. Right now, the justices are hearing arguments in a very closely watched

case challenging the Trump administration's effort to expand control of independent agencies and reshape the federal

government. CNN's chief Supreme Court analyst, Joan Buscupik, explains what's at stake and how the

president could be on the verge of gaining even more power.

I'm about to go inside the Supreme Court for a hearing that's underway over President Trump's ability to fire the heads of independent agencies.

This case is going to test more than what happens to Rebecca Slaughter, who's the woman that he fired from the Federal Trade Commission in March.

This case goes to the power and independence of special agencies that Congress has set up

with regulatory power over like the financial industries, labor, environment, places that are supposed to be independent

and the pressure, President Trump wouldn't be able to pressure them through firing. They should only be removed for some sort of misconduct. Now, this case tests a 1935 precedent of the Supreme Court in

which the Supreme Court held unanimously that then President Roosevelt could not fire a commissioner

on the Federal Trade Commission because of the way Congress had established the legislation,

...