meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Facts Matter

Major Supreme Court Ruling Is Slowly Weakening Federal Agencies | Facts Matter

Facts Matter

The Epoch Times

Romanbalmakov, Politics, News Commentary, Theepochtimesroman, Factsmatter, Epochtimes, Factsmatterroman, Roman, Romanepochtimes, News

51.2K Ratings

🗓️ 4 September 2024

⏱️ 14 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

In this week’s episode we dive into the U.S. Supreme Court ruling that struck down a doctrine known as Chevron deference.
The ruling has far reaching implications on federal agencies’ power to interpret policy. 🇺🇸 Epoch Times 25¢ Sale: https://ept.ms/RomanSale1

Join Roman on this week’s episode of Facts Matter.

🇺🇸Roman's Special Offer👉 https://ept.ms/RomanSpecialOffer
⭕️ Support our fight for the truth👉 https://donorbox.org/facts_matter

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

And the In a major new ruling, the US Supreme Court has just delivered a serious blow to the

0:21.7

administrative state by eliminating the very framework which

0:26.2

allowed federal agencies to basically interpret the law however they wish.

0:30.5

Specifically, the US Supreme Court struck down something that's known as the

0:34.1

doctrine of Chevron deference. It sounds a little bit technical, but in a

0:39.1

practical sense, this one Supreme Court ruling, it eliminated the very core of the power that federal agencies

0:46.8

claim to possess. But that power is no more. Moving forward, unelected bureaucrats over in Washington will no longer have the

0:54.7

authority to make rules that then have the force of law. Let me explain specifically

1:00.1

the background of this particular case as well as what it means for common Americans like you and I moving forward. the a case called Chevron versus the National Resources Defense Council made its way up to the US Supreme Court.

1:16.1

Without getting too deep into the weeds of that particular case, the end result was that the

1:21.1

1984 Supreme Court they ruled in favor of Chevron and in so

1:25.5

doing they created a new administrative framework. If there was an ambiguity in a

1:30.4

given statute well the courts they would defer the interpretation of that statute

1:35.0

to the relevant federal agency.

1:37.0

In other words, quote,

1:38.5

a government agency must conform to any clear legislation statements

1:42.0

when interpreting and applying a law.

1:44.0

But courts will give the agency deference in ambiguous situations as long as the agency's

1:49.2

interpretation is reasonable.

1:51.3

In plain English, it means that an agency has to conform to the letter of the law,

1:56.4

but if there was even a slight ambiguity in the law, well, they can interpret that ambiguity

2:01.0

as they may, and the courts will defer to their expertise. The thinking behind interpret that

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from The Epoch Times, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of The Epoch Times and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.