Mailbag: How information leaks, State of Minor League Baseball, being friends with players (6/11)

Nothing Personal with David Samson

David Samson

Sports, Business, Baseball

4.7 • 3.1K Ratings

🗓️ 11 June 2021

⏱️ 46 minutes

🔗️ Recording | iTunes | RSS

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Mailbag! It’s a mailbag! It’s time for some mail! We get so many questions so even when there’s no show… there is still a show! (1:20) Let’s talk about leaks. Someone asked about leaking information and what would happen when someone got caught leaking information. What about intentionally leaking information… (12:40) Someone asked how you would describe the relationship between players and the front office. Can you become friends with players? (20:12) Someone asked me what the state of Minor League Baseball and the MLB Draft is. Which direction is this league headed in? (30:18) Someone asked me about the Beloit Snappers plan for naming rights. The team announced it would be done on a daily basis. (37:48) Someone asked what’s easier in terms of expectations: running a big market or small market team? Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0	Well,
0:19.5	mailbag. Nothing personal word of the day is mailbag. We have a mailbag bonus
0:25.6	episode for you. Here's how it works. You're supposed to follow nothing
0:30.8	personal on Spotify. You're supposed to rate and review on Apple for some
0:36.1	reason. People, I don't know who maybe Coke or maybe other people at CBS or
0:40.6	other companies, they follow people who subscribe to your YouTube channel. The
0:45.5	number of Twitter followers you have, the number of Instagram followers you have
0:49.1	at David P. Samson, although that's really sort of a personal Instagram. And on
0:54.2	Apple, you can rate five stars and you can write a review. And what I've been
0:58.3	doing with Coke for the past, I don't even know how long it's been going on
1:01.7	Coke, but maybe eight months, maybe it's more, we've been doing a mailbag
1:06.4	episode where when you write a review within Apple's podcast, nothing personal
1:12.6	site. And within that review, you ask a question, I'm going to take an episode
1:17.2	every once in a while we do it at the end of the month, but here we are in, you
1:20.7	know, in the middle of a month. And I answer them. And here's how it goes. I
1:26.1	read the question, I answer it. I go to the next question. And I don't want to
1:29.9	waste a second of time because there's so many questions that we're just
1:34.8	going to start mailbag. If inside information was being reported that the
1:45.2	organization didn't want to be released, would you attempt to discover who was
1:49.3	leaking the info? And how would you deal with the person if discovered?
1:53.6	Alternatively, what was the process for intentionally leaking info that the
1:58.3	organization wanted to be made public? I love this subject. I wanted to lead
	...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Previous episode | Next episode

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from David Samson, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of David Samson and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.