MAGA Says the ’60s Were Too Woke and Wants Racial Immigration Quotas Back
Opening Arguments
Opening Arguments Media LLC
4.3 • 3.7K Ratings
🗓️ 20 May 2026
⏱️ 83 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Summary
VR32 - As the economic effects of Trump’s war of choice in the Middle East begin to hit home, his party is playing the one card it has going into the midterms: the promise of fully restoring open white supremacy to the US immigration system. We begin with a sampler platter of amuse douche from a recent episode of Tim Pool’s podcast–mercifully free of Tim Pool–to get a sense of how the MAGA right is talking about immigration reform these days. Matt then gives a brief history lesson about the openly racist origins of the Immigration Act of 1924 and the Cold War origins of the 1965 Hart-Celler bill which Republicans are now trying to repeal before we dive into the main course: a recent piece in The Federalist written in support of Rep. Andy Ogle’s Assimilation Act. Why do these people hate families so much? Can Congress really end birthright citizenship? And can you really build an entire thinkpiece entirely out of red flags? Join us this week on Vapid Response Wednesday to find out.
-
The National Visa Bulletin’s website
-
Whom We Shall Welcome (1952)
-
It’s Long Past Time To Scrap Hart-Celler And Insist That Immigrants Assimilate (John Daniel Davidson, The Federalist; 5/15/2026)
Check out the OA Linktree for all the places to go and things to do!
Transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
| 0:00.0 | Hello and welcome to VAPID Response Wednesday. I'm Thomas. That over there is real life attorney, Matt Cameron. How are you doing, Matt? |
| 0:16.8 | Hey, all right, Thomas. One of my favorite subjects today, just going to get into some old-timey racism and contemporary racism. When you're sick of the newfangled stuff. That's right. You go back to the classics. Yeah. We all get nostalgic for different things. You know, Matt is apparently old-timey racism. When you're just up to your eyeballs and newfangled racism, it's good to get. You know, but the new stuff is a lot like the old stuff. |
| 0:39.3 | But I guess we'll see. |
| 0:40.0 | We'll see how alike it is. Well, you know how it is? If you were just doing racism in the 60s, it's going to hit different today. So you've got to be prepared. And producer Lydia, how you doing? Hi, doing pretty well. How are you? I feel like I haven't asked you on this show for a while. |
| 0:54.4 | I think I need a haircut. |
| 0:55.6 | My hair's a little crazy. |
| 0:56.7 | I came all at once. doing pretty well. How are you? I feel like I haven't asked you on this show for a while. |
| 0:54.2 | I think I need a hair cut. My hair's a little crazy. I came all at once. I was like, what is all this hair? And then like vaguely. So that's all that's happening with me. Literally nothing else. Like your B-12 intake is really high or something. Your hair's growing real fast. I don't know what that's about. Anyway, yeah, Matt, what are we going to be talking about today? Old time of |
| 1:13.8 | racism, More detail? So, yeah, I'm getting ahead of what I think is going to be what I'm calling a heartseller summer. The Hartseller Immigration Act of 1965 is on the chopping block, potentially. Once again, it's a Republican favorite. I've been hearing some talking points in the last few days that are pretty disturbing about why we should be going back to the 1924 racial quotas that you and I have discussed before. |
| 1:34.3 | It's a great episode on that around the end of the year. Just fantastic stuff. We'll revisit some of that. |
| 1:40.4 | Here's my first thought, Matt. Wouldn't that be actually currently better than where |
| 1:44.5 | we are now? Because right now, we're only letting in literally white South Africans as refugees. Yeah. So if you go, okay. Yeah. I was going to say, if you want to apply a quota, they'd be like, whoa, wait a minute. Well, I thought it was zero of anybody we don't like. Well, as you'll see, The quota was 100 for quite a while. |
| 2:01.8 | Wow. |
| 2:02.0 | Exactly 100 a year. |
| 2:03.2 | So, yeah, but this is apart from the refugee program. So we're going to be talking about sort of the basis of our entire immigration system and how Andy Ogles wants to change that from Tennessee. He's introducing a bill. The full text isn't out yet, but from what I've seen, it's a nightmare, just the pieces of it. And the Republican talking points on this are going to be normalizing some things that are completely abnormal. So I want to do a little teaching first to kind of let people know how we got to this place, the 1965 Act, how it was passed, why it was passed. I'm going to give you enough information that by the time we get to the John Daniel Davidson Federalist piece that we're going to read at the end, I think you'll understand |
| 2:36.5 | just how stupid it actually is. As stupid as the previous piece we read by John Daniel Davidson? |
| 2:44.0 | I don't know. I was that Charlie Kirk. |
| 2:46.3 | Let the audience be the judge, yeah. It was a Charlie, something about how Charlie Kirk is. |
| 2:50.4 | We'll tell them when we get there. Yeah. It was something about how Charlie Kirk is. Well, we'll tell them when we get there. |
| 2:52.1 | Yeah. |
| 2:54.2 | All right. |
| 2:54.9 | Well, I'm excited for all that nonsense. |
... |
Transcript will be available on the free plan in 10 days. Upgrade to see the full transcript now.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Opening Arguments Media LLC, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of Opening Arguments Media LLC and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.

