meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Mac OS Ken

Mac OS Ken: 12.15.2014

Mac OS Ken

Ken Ray

Technology

4.7996 Ratings

🗓️ 15 December 2014

⏱️ 19 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

15 December 2014 - Court Hears Apple Ebook Appeal Today - Duplicate 2011 MacBook Pro GPU Case Pops Up in Canada - Park Associates: Smart Home Devices to Gain Steam in 2015 - Xiaomi Invests in Smart Appliance Maker - 100 Protest Economic Inequality at Apple Campus - Apple Adds High-End Headphones from Master and Dynamic to Apple Store - Apple Store in Turkey Wins Architectural Awards - Apple Releases Tearjerker Holiday Ad 2014 - SaneBox: Bring Sanity to Your Inbox with a 2-Week Free Trial at

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

This is Mac OSKIN. The next fight in the bitter book battle, your home stands to get Smata in 2015 and one

0:19.5

Apple store gets a major award. No, it's not a leg lamp.

0:24.0

It's Monday, December 15, 2014.

0:27.0

I'm Ken Ray, and this is news from MacOS Ken.

0:31.0

Brought to you by yours truly and supported by iChart magazine, putting

0:35.8

Apple and Tech News in focus. E-Y-E-I-Chart magazine, available for iOS newsstand now.

0:45.0

Apple's appeal of Judge Denise Coates' e-book price fixing verdict begins today.

0:51.0

It also ends today. Well Well the appeal itself does anyway. Fortune says

0:56.1

Apple gets about one hour to argue against the multi-million dollar ruling in the

1:02.0

case. What it'll argue is both interesting and

1:05.4

confusing. Basically Apple may well have set up a system that incentivized

1:09.9

publishers to gang up on Amazon, but if it did that for its own gain rather than to hurt

1:15.4

Amazon specifically, it shouldn't have been found guilty under the Sherman Antitrust Act.

1:20.9

Quoting Fortune, if Apple's actions are ambiguous, if it merely created for its own business

1:26.4

reasons contractual incentives for the publishers to gang up on Amazon, it should be given the benefit of the doubt.

1:35.0

While the three-judge panel is not likely to rule on Apple's appeal for months, what happens

1:39.3

today is important, while Apple has agreed to a settlement in the case that will likely only

1:44.5

take a fact after all appeals are exhausted. So if the judges say the coat

1:49.6

ruling was valid this case could be headed to the Supreme Court.

1:53.8

If the judges send the case back to Judge Coate,

1:56.3

Apple's settlement goes down to $70 million,

1:59.3

and again, one imagines that's only after every appeal is exhausted and finally the outcome for

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Ken Ray, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Ken Ray and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.