MA v. Karen Read Murder Retrial - Dog Bite Expert Daubert Hearing PART 5
Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary
True Crime Today
3.3 • 907 Ratings
🗓️ 8 January 2025
⏱️ 27 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Summary
Prosecutors allege that Read, 43, drove drunk after a night out and struck O’Keefe, 46, with her car before leaving him to die in a snowbank near his Canton home. Read’s defense, however, claims she is being framed by investigators, casting doubt on the credibility of the case against her.
“We have evidence of a rushed and incomplete investigation,” said Read's attorney. “Karen Read is innocent, and we intend to prove this in court.”
The upcoming Daubert hearing, a critical step in the pretrial process, will examine the admissibility of expert testimony. One key witness is Dr. Marie Russell, who previously testified about injuries O’Keefe sustained, including dog bites, raising questions about the timeline and circumstances of his death.
During the first trial, Dr. Russell's analysis of wounds on O’Keefe’s body played a pivotal role in the defense's argument that the injuries may not have been caused by Read’s vehicle. Prosecutors, however, counter that the evidence overwhelmingly supports their theory of the crime.
“The evidence shows a tragic but clear sequence of events: Karen Read struck John O’Keefe with her vehicle and left him in the snow,” said a representative for the Commonwealth.
The case has been mired in controversy since the beginning. Critics have questioned the investigation's integrity, while supporters of both O’Keefe and Read have expressed frustration over delays and legal wrangling. The mistrial declared in July 2024, stemming from undisclosed issues during jury deliberations, added another layer of complexity.
Despite the contentious nature of the case, Read maintains her innocence. “This has been a nightmare, but I believe the truth will come out,” Read stated in a previous court appearance.
The motions hearing is expected to address procedural matters and the scope of evidence admissible in the retrial, which is scheduled for later this year. Both the prosecution and defense are preparing for a high-stakes trial that could ultimately hinge on expert testimony, forensic evidence, and competing narratives.
As the legal battle continues, the case remains a focal point of public and media interest, drawing attention to issues of justice, law enforcement, and accountability.
#KarenRead #JohnOKeefe #BostonNews #CourtUpdates #TrueCrime #JusticeSystem #Massachusetts
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
Transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
| 0:00.0 | This is continuing coverage of the trial of Karen Reid from the Hidden Killers podcast and true crime today. |
| 0:07.0 | Now back to the courtroom. |
| 0:09.0 | And went through her qualifications and we adduced much more of her qualifications, much more than were adduced when Your Honor first found |
| 0:23.6 | that finding and made that finding. So let's start with the law. Mr. Brennan and I agree on one thing. |
| 0:31.6 | The Rotola case is relevant. But respectfully, Mr. Brennan went off in a tangent because what |
| 0:43.1 | does Ritola stand for that's relevant here quote the crucial issue crucial in |
| 0:51.0 | determining whether a witness is qualified to give an expert opinion |
| 0:54.9 | is whether the witness has sufficient education training experience and |
| 1:00.9 | familiarity with the subject matter of the testimony what is the subject matter |
| 1:06.6 | of the testimony it's what are the cause of the wounds to the deceased's right arm. |
| 1:13.2 | I submit that if you ran an artificial intelligence program, you couldn't come up with a more |
| 1:21.6 | perfect witness for the subject matter of this testimony. Emergency medicine physician, 29 years experience, |
| 1:30.3 | forensic, trained pathologist who has co-authored books on dog bites. She's well versed in the |
| 1:39.3 | articles. She is consulted by experts like Dr. Vail that you heard about for these types of issues. |
| 1:47.0 | The crucial issue of whether she's qualified to me is 100% your favorite, |
| 1:53.0 | and I don't believe you could find another witness more qualified. |
| 1:58.0 | And that's the crucial inquiry. |
| 2:00.0 | What's the second prong of the inquiry |
| 2:02.0 | after qualifications is the methodology reliable that's the second whether |
| 2:12.4 | mr. Brennan agrees and 95% of what he argued that's for cross at trial but more importantly |
| 2:21.8 | that's for a jury to determine that's the job in province of a jury to determine |
| 2:30.1 | whether assuming mr. Brennan ever gets a doctor to come in and counter Dr. Russell. |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from True Crime Today, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of True Crime Today and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.