MA v. Karen Read Murder Retrial - Day 28 Part 2
The Trial Of Karen Read | Justice For John O'Keefe
Tony Brueski
2.2 • 614 Ratings
🗓️ 7 June 2025
⏱️ 90 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Summary
This is audio from the courtroom in the high-profile murder retrial of Karen Read in Dedham, Massachusetts. She's facing second-degree murder charges and more in connection with the death of her boyfriend, Boston Police Officer John O’Keefe. Prosecutors allege Read struck O'Keefe with her SUV and left him to die in the snow outside a friend’s home after a night of drinking. Stay tuned as both sides lay out their version of what happened that night.
Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?
Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod
Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod
Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872
Transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
| 0:00.0 | You're listening to live courtroom coverage of the trial of Karen Reid from the Hidden |
| 0:05.1 | Killers podcast and true crime today. Now, back to the courtroom. |
| 0:25.5 | Dr. Wolf, may I inquire, Your Honor? Yes. |
| 0:26.5 | Dr. Wolf, where are we on the chart? |
| 0:29.8 | I've lost my place. |
| 0:30.8 | I think hypothesis. |
| 0:32.7 | Okay. |
| 0:35.0 | Let's describe, if you would, please, where what hypothesis, what role hypothesis |
| 0:43.6 | plays in the general scientific method? So generally, it's, like I said, it's an if-then |
| 0:50.3 | statement. So if you make a statement, if the arm contacts the tail light, then the tail light |
| 0:58.4 | will shatter, right? So you want to do tests and experimentation and analyze that data to see whether |
| 1:05.2 | you can accept or reject that hypothesis. And what's the next stage? So as I mentioned, after hypothesis, it's once you've determined that, what your hypothesis |
| 1:16.0 | is you want to test with experimentation, analyze that data, and that certainly may be an iterative |
| 1:21.2 | process that you do multiple times to then be able to draw a conclusion from that analysis |
| 1:27.2 | and testing. |
| 1:28.3 | What's the next stage? |
| 1:30.3 | To basically report those conclusions and findings. |
| 1:34.3 | Why is it important to report those conclusions and findings? |
| 1:38.3 | Well, I think so that you can, whether you can accept or reject the hypothesis that was put forward earlier. |
| 1:47.0 | You have to, do you have to analyze the data following the testing that you undertake? |
| 1:55.0 | Yes, like I mentioned, I think it's an iterative process, because certainly you could do one test, |
| 2:00.0 | and it may not be clear |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Tony Brueski, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of Tony Brueski and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.

