You're listening to live courtroom coverage of the trial of Karen Reid from the Hidden Killers podcast and True Crime Today.

Now, back to the courtroom.

By merely noting a clock skew without engaging in any further analysis, such as tethering that clock skew or otherwise connecting it to the

text stream event in dr. Welchers slide presentation no I did not switch to another

topic take that down thank you you, Mr. Wob. After reviewing, and I'm going to identify three timelines,

after reviewing the timelines, you're reviewing, the timelines presented by Dr.

Welcher, one, Mr. D'Sograra 2, and Mr. Ian Wiffin, 3.

All of which established that the 1162

Techstream event occurred before that last user activity, the lock on Mr. O'Kee's phone, you then decided to issue

a new report that would become dated May 8, 2025, correct?

Objection.

I'm going to allow that.

No, so I issued the secondary, the supplemental report based on that presentation that you just had up.

Well, before you issued that report, isn't it correct that you had reviewed the time data of Dr. Welcher in the slide that we've been reviewing?

Not before that time, no.

You had not looked at Dr. Welcher's slide with a text stream event, 11622, and a time for that

before issuing your May 8th report?

No, yes. Before my, sorry, miss heard you.

That's my question.

So what I, let me just ask it through a question.

Sure.

So it is correct that before you issued your May 8th, 2025 report, that you had reviewed that slide of your colleague Dr. Welcher on 1162, 2, that

...