So this case of Luigi Mangione, let's get right to it.

Let's get to the stop and what the arguments are here.

And the argument here is obviously what the police are allowed to do in a stop question and frisk situation.

And what are they allowed to do?

And then when a stop question and frisk situation becomes an arrest, the level of the stop

of the stop gives the police probable cause, there is another level of intrusion that they're

allowed to perform. And that's called a search incidental to a lawful arrest. It allows police

to search a person or their immediate area without a warrant. That's an important thing.

The purpose of this search is to ensure the safety of the police and to prevent the destruction of evidence.

One is a search incident to arrest permitted.

There must be a lawful arrest.

The search must be incident to the arrest.

The search must be reasonable. what is considered a reasonable search.

A search of the person of the area within their immediate control.

A search for weapons or dangerous items.

A search for evidence related to the suspected crime.

What are the limitations of a search incident to arrest?

A search cannot be based on probable cause that might have led to an arrest.

A search of bags and other possessions not within the arrestee's immediate reach might not be justified.

What if the police find something illegal during a search incident to arrest?

The police must take the item and arrest the arrestee for possessing it.

So all of these things are from the police perspective

...