meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Thinking LSAT

LSAC's Stealth RC Change (Ep. 543)

Thinking LSAT

Nathan Fox and Ben Olson

Education

4.6886 Ratings

🗓️ 26 January 2026

⏱️ 50 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

On the January LSAT, some test-takers noticed their RC section lacked a comparative reading passage. LSAC had quietly updated the test to allow zero to one comparative passages per RC section. Ben and Nathan explain why this change should have no impact on test-takers.

Also in this episode

- Florida ends the ABA’s status as the state’s sole law school accreditor

- A viewer writes in to share their full-tuition scholarship success story

- Should you write a GPA addendum for a semester that ended early?


Study with our Free Plan⁠

⁠Download our iOS app⁠

Watch Episode 543 on YouTube

Check out all of our “What’s the Deal With” segments

Get caught up with our ⁠Word of the Week⁠⁠ library


0:00 Florida Supreme Court News

2:55 Law School Horror Stories

10:47 ABA Legal Education Arm Seeks Independence

14:50 LSAT Rule Change

20:19 Not Paying for Law School

21:52 Test D Question — Four Iron

32:00 High Diagnostic Score

38:44 Things We Actually Enjoy

40:02 GPA Addendum

45:07 Word of the week — euchre

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Test takers were surprised this week by a format change in the test that the law school

0:03.9

admission council did not announce ahead of time. Some tests had no comparative passages in the

0:10.0

reading comprehension portion of the test. It is kind of like not actually a big deal, but it

0:15.0

sure seems like a big deal to some people. Hello and welcome to episode 543 of the Thinking Elsaat podcast. I'm Ben Olson. With me is Nathan

0:30.6

Fox. We're the co-founders of Elsaid Demon.com and the Elsaid Demon Daily podcast. We have an

0:35.9

ABA news item here after, yeah.

0:40.1

I'm not sure how much news there actually is here.

0:43.4

But yeah, from Central Florida Public Media, we have an article that says after

0:48.0

governors urging Florida Supreme Court opens doors to new law school accreditors.

0:53.7

Florida voted five to one that the American Bar Association is no longer the primary or only

0:59.8

accreditor of law schools in Florida.

1:03.1

Blah, blah, blah.

1:05.5

Florida can now start reaching out to alternate accreditors starting October 1st.

1:14.2

And any new accreditors of universities have to be approved by the U.S. Department of Education.

1:19.7

Apparently, the American Bar Association is the only currently approved accreditor by the U.S.

1:24.7

Department of Education.

1:25.6

I assume that the reason why that's relevant is because of access to federal funds. So I don't know how much impact this can possibly have

1:35.3

in the short run. It seems like nothing is going to happen until October 1st. Florida, like Texas,

1:42.3

Florida is the second state now to do this.

1:52.4

Conservative states that are upset with the liberal politics and they're just lashing out, exactly.

1:59.7

It seems as if there, I thought Texas was going to have their own state Supreme Court accredited law schools.

2:01.8

It seems like they were taking it on themselves.

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Nathan Fox and Ben Olson, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Nathan Fox and Ben Olson and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.