Oh, yay.

Oh, yay.

The judicial power of the United States shall be vested in one Supreme Court.

Unless there is any more question to be able to find an argument in this case.

All persons having business before the Honorable, the Supreme Court of the United States are admonished to give their attention.

Welcome to Divided Argument, an unscheduled, unpredictable,

Supreme Court podcast. I'm Dan Epps.

And I'm Will Bowd.

So we are recording this much later at night than we normally do.

You were on a trip somewhere, and this is the only time you could squeeze in.

It's 10 p.m. central time. So I hope our listeners are impressed with

our commitment to the show. I'm actually quite tired. So my analysis will suffer more than it

usually does from my own natural limitations. Maybe. Maybe you'll just get like funnier and more honest.

I'm not casting aspersions on your normal level of funniness or honesty, but I feel like I say,

say what I think. I try to. Okay. In terms of harsh honesty, long-time listener, Colin Stretch, writes in, and he says he has some tough but fair

feedback. He says, the strengths of the podcast is its high signal-to-noise ratio, presents high-quality

information and analysis with the occasional and usually amusing digression. It suffers when the

digression has become the point. June 7th episode hit the 27-minute mark

for turning to any sort of information or analysis

about court business.

It was in a word, painful.

Okay, I don't remember exactly what we digressed upon,

...