Hi everybody. Welcome back to Drop Dead Serious. I'm Ashley Banfield, and today we're

diving into day two of Lori Vallow's Arizona trial, where she's defending herself against charges

of conspiracy to commit murder in the shooting death of her fourth

husband, count him four, Charles Vallow. Let me just give you a bit of an overview for how the

day went. I think the word of the day might be cringe, especially if you do this for a living.

Like you follow trials, legal criminal procedure, and then you see somebody who thinks

she knows better trying to defend herself in court and actually get up and act like a lawyer

in the well.

And you know what?

It's really hard to do that.

So it was cringe-worthy the number of times. The judge had to school her,

stop her, and how she just kind of behaved, I hate to say this in a girlish kind of way,

like a child. Anyway, she would go back and forth between giggling and tough guy, which, you know,

doesn't endear you to anybody. Today she was a little better in terms of

holding back on the eye rolling and the head shaking, which is never a good idea either if you're

going to be a professional lawyer in a courtroom. Also something we saw today, which I love

and I almost never get to see it. It's super rare is that in this

jurisdiction in Arizona, jurors are allowed to ask questions during the actual testimony part of the case,

like the evidentiary part of the case. You've always heard about, you know, a jury has a question

while they're deliberating. But in about, you know, a jury has a question while

they're deliberating. But in Arizona, you're allowed as a juror to ask questions of the witnesses

while they're on the stand. Like first you've got to get through direct, right? And then cross

...