meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Patrick Boyle On Finance

Lordstown Motors Executives Sold $8 Million of Stock Before Bad News Broke

Patrick Boyle On Finance

Patrick Boyle

Investing, Business

4.9320 Ratings

🗓️ 23 June 2021

⏱️ 11 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Send us a textMembers of the leadership team at Lordstown Motors appear to have sold large amounts of company stock just before reports of various troubles at the company became public. Five top Lordstown executives—including president Rich Schmidt, now former chief financial officer Julio Rodriguez, and propulsion head Chuan "John" Vo—sold some of their shares worth a total of more than $8 million in early February when the stock was worth around $24 a share. Today, it's worth around $10.Pat...

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Hello and welcome. You are listening to Patrick Boyle on Finance, a podcast exploring ideas from quantitative finance, examining events occurring in markets right now and financial history to see what lessons can be taken away, including interviews with some of the most interesting people in the world of finance. To learn more about the podcast, visit onfinance.org.

0:27.7

Lordstown Motors is an EV or electric vehicle company that went public last October through a

0:33.8

spike. They claimed to have designed an electric pickup truck which they call the Endurance.

0:39.3

Their website says that the endurance helps you get out of any sticky muddy or slippery situation,

0:46.3

which might be helpful for some of the senior executives at Lords Town, as they seem to have

0:51.3

found themselves in exactly such a situation.

0:55.0

Unfortunately, the endurance is just a drawing of a truck and not a real truck,

0:59.0

so they'll probably need to use good old-fashioned lawyers

1:02.0

to get themselves out of any sticky situations they find themselves in.

1:07.0

One of the biggest differences between going public by IPO and going public via a SPAC is that

1:13.6

companies that went public through a SPAC merger felt that they could pitch their financial

1:19.0

projections or forward looking statements to investors, while a company that went public

1:25.1

through an IPO was and is not allowed to do this, the

1:30.4

reason for this is that a SPAC initially goes public as a shell company and then merges

1:36.3

with the company that they'll take public.

1:39.4

Because this deal is technically a merger rather than an IPO, SPACS relied on safe harbour laws to make forward-looking

1:47.0

statements. They included projections in their public filings. The idea was that if the projections

1:53.4

turned out not to be true and the stock fell, end investors would have a hard time suing for securities

2:00.4

fraud because of safe harbour rules relating to forward-looking projections from public companies.

2:07.1

Going public via SPAC allowed companies to market themselves to investors based on projected future revenue and income, which may or may not happen. While with an IPO or a direct

2:19.9

listing, companies could only tell investors about their past financial results. If you were an

2:26.4

EV company and good at drawing vehicles but hadn't necessarily built any, it was much more

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Patrick Boyle, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Patrick Boyle and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.