meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Nature Podcast

Long Read Podcast: Are feelings more than skin deep?

Nature Podcast

podcast@nature.com

News, Science, Technology

4.5893 Ratings

🗓️ 13 March 2020

⏱️ 15 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Research in the 1960s and 1970s suggested that emotional expressions – smiling when happy, scowling when angry, and so on – were universal. This idea stood unchallenged for a generation.


But a new cohort of psychologists and cognitive scientists are revisiting the data. Many researchers now think that the picture is a lot more complicated, and that facial expressions vary widely between contexts and cultures.


This is an audio version of our feature: Why faces don’t always tell the truth about feelings, written by Douglas Heaven and read by Kerri Smith.


Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Yes! I just can't believe!

0:02.4

This Christmas, you could be a millionaire.

0:05.2

Get your lotto ticket for tonight's draw.

0:07.0

The National Lottery. Rules and procedures apply. Players must be 18 or over.

0:14.4

Welcome to this audio long read from nature.

0:17.7

In this episode, why faces don't always tell the truth about feelings. Written by Douglas

0:23.4

Heaven and read by Kerry Smith. Human faces pop up on a screen, hundreds of them, one after

0:32.1

another. Some have their eyes stretched wide, others show lips clenched. Some have eyes squeezed shut,

0:38.9

cheeks lifted and mouths gape. For each one you must answer this simple question. Is this

0:44.8

the face of someone having an orgasm or experiencing sudden pain? Psychologist Rachel Jack and her

0:51.6

colleagues recruited 80 people to take this test as part of a study in 2018.

0:56.7

The team at the University of Glasgow, UK, enlisted participants from Western and East Asian cultures to explore a long-standing and highly charged question.

1:06.6

To facial expressions reliably communicate emotions.

1:13.4

Researchers have been asking people what emotions they perceive in faces for decades. They have questioned adults and children in different

1:18.8

countries and indigenous populations in remote parts of the world. Influential observations in the

1:24.9

1960s and 70s by US psychologist Paul Ekman suggested that around the world humans could reliably infer emotional states from expressions on faces, implying that emotional expressions are universal.

1:38.8

These ideas stood largely unchallenged for a generation. But a new cohort of psychologists and cognitive scientists

1:45.5

has been revisiting those data and questioning the conclusions. Many researchers now think that the

1:51.5

picture is a lot more complicated and that facial expressions vary widely between contexts and cultures.

1:58.0

Rachel Jack's study, for instance, found that although Westerners and East Asians

2:01.7

had similar concepts of how faces display pain, they had different ideas about expressions of pleasure.

2:08.3

Researchers are increasingly split over the validity of Ekman's conclusions. But the debate

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from podcast@nature.com, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of podcast@nature.com and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.