Welcome back to the bonus content queens.

Welcome back.

And as promised, we have part two of our logical fallacy series, getting philosophical again.

Yeah, knowing how to take apart arguments without subcoming to the emotional tricks that they play on you.

Yeah. And I think it's also recognizing when you're being

emotionally manipulated and when you're probably arguing with, I always find in life you have to

pick your battles, right? And I always find if people resort to things that ad homonym or misrepresenting

my argument, I don't mean to sound this in the snobby way, but it gives me an indication that perhaps

this person isn't really worth engaging with because they're not actually engaging with what I'm saying.

Absolutely. I don't have a problem being a snob. I am a snob.

Intellectual snob, international snob might.

And values snob. I mean, it doesn't mean I'm going to be rude, but I do have like a sort of hierarchy for people. If I happen to talk with somebody who is mean or is engaging in bad faith arguments, it's not good, I'm going to slap his face, but, you know, why would I waste energy there? That's it. And you'll see a lot of people on the internet especially who do this.

And I do feel like, I don't know, again, I don't know what life was like when before the internet.

But I feel like people should be more enlightened and more knowledgeable because we have the internet.

But I don't know about you, Patricia.

I feel like we're going backwards.

I really do.

Exposure to information doesn't make you more more smart. It makes you more stupid.

I actually was listening to like an intellectual crazy podcast and they were talking about how

when writing was invented, you can correlate that to today's wheels or like stupid memes.

There was a lot of literature about absolutely nothing and stupid things, and that was the

popular one.

...