meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Advisory Opinions

LIVE: SCOTUS Hears Birthright Citizenship Case

Advisory Opinions

The Dispatch

News, Politics, Government

4.8 • 3.6K Ratings

🗓️ 15 May 2025

⏱️ 64 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

In a special live Advisory Opinions x SCOTUSblog crossover event, Sarah Isgur was joined by David French, David Lat, Zachary Shemtob, and Amy Howe (live from the Supreme Court), to react to the oral argument in Trump v. CASA, Inc. The question: Whether the Supreme Court should stay the district court’s nationwide preliminary injunction on the Trump administration’s executive order ending birthright citizenship. Advisory Opinions is a production of The Dispatch, a digital media company covering politics, policy, and culture from a non-partisan, conservative perspective. To access all of The Dispatch’s offerings, ⁠⁠⁠click here⁠⁠⁠. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Ready?

0:02.0

I was born ready.

0:04.0

Hi everyone!

0:05.0

And special shout out to all of you who were just with us for two and a half

0:25.3

hours on the live blog of those oral arguments. And a special thank you to professors Will

0:33.7

Bode and Amanda Tyler, who joined us for that live blog. So let me set up what we were just

0:40.3

doing and listening to in that oral argument. The Supreme Court, as we said, just listened to

0:45.9

two and a half hours of oral arguments on this emergency appeal, interim relief appeal.

0:53.1

We can have a debate about what we're calling that docket in a few minutes.

0:56.2

Related to Donald Trump's executive order on birthright citizenship. So, and by the way, since we normally do this as just a podcast, you guys don't see me read off all my tabs, but I do. I don't always have this stuff memorized.

1:08.9

So the, you know, substantive part of that executive

1:13.2

order was that when a person's mother is unlawfully present in the United States and a person's

1:20.5

father was not a United States citizen or lawful permanent resident at the time of said person's

1:25.8

birth, or when that person's mother's presence

1:29.2

in the United States was lawful but temporary and the person's father was not a United States

1:33.3

citizen or lawful permanent resident at the time of said person's birth, they would not

1:37.3

automatically get American citizenship as they do now. So it's that illegal presence or temporary

1:43.9

presence would not have birthright citizenship

1:47.2

automatically under the 14th Amendment as we've been doing since the passage of the 14th Amendment in

1:53.9

1868. Now, we had a number of lower courts issue, so-called universal injunctions, nationwide injunctions,

2:03.5

preventing this order from going into effect. The Trump administration then asked the

2:09.7

Supreme Court to hear this. And what was so interesting was that in their briefing to the

...

Transcript will be available on the free plan in 14 days. Upgrade to see the full transcript now.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from The Dispatch, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of The Dispatch and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright Š Tapesearch 2025.