meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Cato Podcast

Little Pink House and Kelo

Cato Podcast

Cato Institute

Immigration, News, News Commentary, Peace, 424708, Markets, Government, Libertarian, Policy, Politics, Cato, Defense

4.5979 Ratings

🗓️ 21 April 2018

⏱️ 22 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

The story of Kelo v. City of New London is now in theaters in Little Pink House. Scott Bullock argued the case before the U.S. Supreme Court. Courtney Balaker directed the film, which is now in theaters.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

This is the Cato Daily Podcast for Saturday, April 21st, 2018.

0:09.0

I'm Keelab Brown.

0:10.1

When Susette Kilo's home was stolen by her local government to benefit a large corporation,

0:14.8

she helped launch a national effort to seriously examine the circumstances

0:19.2

under which the government may seize private property.

0:22.1

Now the story of the Kilo case is hitting the big screen in Little Pink House.

0:27.0

This week I spoke with Scott Bullock, who argued the Kilo case before the Supreme Court,

0:31.4

and Courtney Balaker, the director of Little Pink House, now in limited

0:35.1

release across the United States.

0:38.1

Scott, how are you introduced to this case?

0:41.0

You were an attorney at the Institute for Justice and you presume this is one of IJ's pillars, private property.

0:48.0

How were you introduced to it?

0:50.0

Well, we started doing more and more of these cases.

0:54.0

It was at that time, primarily myself and my colleague,

0:57.5

Dana Berliner, started doing these cases.

1:00.8

It's starting in the mid-90s.

1:02.4

Our first one, of course course was an Atlantic City against

1:05.2

none other than our current president who was trying to get the local government

1:10.5

there the state agency to take property away from an elderly widow for Trump

1:16.6

Casino at the time.

1:18.4

And that really touched off, we won that case, and it touched off a whole series of cases that we did and once we won that

1:25.6

case we were inundated with requests and we realized that this was going on

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Cato Institute, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Cato Institute and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.