meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
More or Less

Life-saving economics

More or Less

BBC

News Commentary, Science, Mathematics, News

4.63.7K Ratings

🗓️ 22 October 2012

⏱️ 9 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Professor Al Roth tells Tim Harford about the work for which he has just been awarded the 2012 Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

There are dozens of different podcasts now available from the BBC, including news, documentaries,

0:06.7

science, business, arts and sport. The details of the more go to BBCWorldService.com slash podcasts.

0:17.8

Hello and welcome to more or less on the BBC World Service, your numerical guide to news and to life.

0:25.2

I'm Tim Harford. This week we're lavishing our entire eight minutes and 59 seconds on one man.

0:32.8

Why? Because he's Professor Al Roth and this week he won the Nobel Memorial prize in economics.

0:39.2

He didn't win it on his own. He shared the prize with Lloyd Shapley. When Roth was just a boy,

0:44.9

Shapley and a colleague David Gale published an important mathematical paper about something called

0:50.7

matching algorithms. I began my conversation with Al Roth by asking him to explain that work.

0:57.0

In 1962, David Gale and Lloyd Shapley wrote a very remarkable article in which they said,

1:03.2

let's think about how, in abstract, college admissions might work or even marriage,

1:08.3

and they thought about a process of iterative proposals and acceptances and rejections that would

1:14.8

lead to a good outcome. You've got a bunch of men, a bunch of women or you've got a bunch of

1:19.2

students and a bunch of universities and you're trying to fix everybody up with a good enough

1:23.7

match. And their idea was that, say, the men would all start by proposing to their first choice.

1:29.8

Woman and the women would reject all but the offer they most preferred, but they wouldn't

1:36.4

immediately accept that offer. And what the women would do is they would hold the best offer they

1:41.2

had received and reject the rest. And all the men who had been rejected would make a proposal

1:46.0

to their next best choice, to the best choice who hadn't yet rejected them. And at each stage,

1:50.8

every woman who got new proposals would look at any new proposals she got, she'd compare them to

1:55.8

the proposal that she might be holding and she'd choose the best of those and reject the others.

2:01.0

So someone she'd held after round one, she might reject after round two if she got a better offer

2:06.5

to hold. And that would proceed until no men wanted to make any more offers and no more rejections

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from BBC, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of BBC and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.