Oh, yay, oh, yay, oh, yay, oh, yay.

The judicial power of the United States shall be vested in one Supreme Court.

Unless there is any more question to be able to find an argument in this case.

All persons having business before the Honorable, the Supreme Court of the United States, are in honor us to give their attention.

Welcome to Divided Argument, an unscheduled, unpredictable Supreme Court podcast. I'm Dan Epps.

And I'm well-bode.

So we'll, we're going to try to march through some of the backlog from the court's term.

This is my favorite part of our recordings, a recording life cycle, I think.

Yeah, it's fun. We get to spend a little bit

time kind of mulling over and digesting opinions that other people have already forgotten

about, I would say. Yeah, we're not trying to keep up with the takes or the hot takes.

Yeah, and it's not quite as overwhelming as having to kind of read the transcripts and look

at all the briefs and try to figure what's going on. The court gives us the opinion. We read the transcripts and look at all the briefs and try to figure what's going on. The court gives us the opinion. We read the opinion. We think about it. We talk about it. And then, and then we move on to the next

episode. Can I ask you something? Actually, what do my colleagues pitch this as an idea? That we ought to get

nine law professors together who, like, in some sense, roughly track the Supreme Court in terms of, you know, some people

left and the right at the middle.

And we ought to spend a year where we try to write opinions in all the cases that are,

like, pretty good and pretty short and pretty sensible before the Supreme Court writes theirs

and just look, they're all out.

And then everybody could judge the court whether or not it was, you know, how it did.

It would be a lot of work.

Would it?

...