Well, howdy there, Internet people, it spell again.

So today, we're going to talk about whether Trump could really take Greenland.

Okay, so we had a question that came in, and it's both something we're known for doing on this channel and very different.

But we're going to go over the

math and the feasibility of something, as we often do when rumors come up, or some cut-rate

politician or pundit advises something, or when some authoritarian decides they want to knock

over their neighbor. Quote, Bell, somebody has to ask, so maybe I'll be the one.

Those videos you always do that are, no, Russia can't take Ukraine in three days. No, we don't actually

have the troops to enforce real martial law in the U.S.

No, we can't take and hold Venezuela with this many troops.

No, the bombing run on Iran isn't a prelude to invasion.

So here's the question.

Can the U.S. really take and hold Greenland?

As people who have seen the other videos like this know,

taking and holding are two very different things.

What makes taking and holding something hard?

Large population.

Greenland doesn't have one.

Drastically different terrains and climates.

Nope. It's all pretty cold and rough.

Heavy military presence.

Nope.

...