Well, howdy there internet people, it's Bow again. So today we are going to talk about

Georgia and interviews and everything that's kind of happened over the last few days regarding that.

And we're going to try to answer the big question

that has been coming in, which is,

do all of these interviews stand a chance of derailing the potential cases against Trump and his circle.

Now I need to start by saying this is way outside of my scope.

This is way outside of my scope.

So I've been looking at all the different legal

analysis and just kind of going through it. There's a pretty general

consensus that the answer is no. This really doesn't matter. It's not going to

de-rail a case. It's annoying but not damaging. It is really what seems to be the

take. And the reason it's not damaging comes down to three different kind of points.

The first is that this isn't actually the grand jury this is the special purpose grand jury

this isn't the one that's going to hand down an indictment

this is an investigative one makes a recommendation the second The second is that there's nothing she can say that's going to be more prejudicial to a potential juror, then all of the media coverage that has already existed.

So this is just something new added on top of it.

It's not anything different than what's already been in the news. And then the

third thing is it happened before the trial, most importantly before jury selection and weeding out any jurors that might have been swayed

by this that would

the,

the prosecution and the defense will go through jury selection

and anybody that might have been swayed by these interviews

...