Well, howdy there internet people, let's go again. So today we are going to talk about two

questions, two very, very, very different questions that more than likely originated from opposite ends of the

current situation from different sides, but the answer is the same.

And it's one of those things that seems very, very counterintuitive at first. It doesn't make any sense. Unless this is a subject you

have studied intensely or you were trained in it, you've read the manual, or you watch the playlist titled,

it's in the manual. I'll put it down below. It just doesn't add up because it's not

what you see in movies. The questions

they revolve around strategy when it comes to a conflict, unconventional war,

whatever term you want to use for it.

Big force, little force.

It involves the strategy for that. The first question is what on earth was

the little force hoping to achieve? And then the other question is, why on earth would the big force show restraint?

Because in a recent video, I said for anybody that was hinging their hopes on international pressure to restrain Israel.

Just because they snatched a bunch of people from going to a bunch of different countries, that's really unlikely.

And there were a whole lot of people asking, why would they be restrained?

Okay, so let's answer the first question first.

What were they hoping to achieve?

They wanted what security clamp down.

That's what they're probably about to get.

They wanted a security clamp down.

That's what they want.

That's the job of the little force when applying this theory.

...