Well, howdy there, internet people it spell again.

So today, we're going to talk about U.S. invasion objectives for Trump's war in Iran.

The reporting has become more and more clear that Trump is considering an invasion of Iran.

They're, of course, trying to frame it as anything other

than that in the press. But we're talking about U.S. troops being deployed inside Iran. They're saying

it'll be limited. They're saying it won't be deep inside Iran's territory and so on. It doesn't

change what Trump is doing. Republican Senator

James Langford said, quote, we've got to be able to know what the objectives are and what

they're actually carrying out. He went on to say, quote, if this is special forces to be able to carry out a specific operation,

get in, get out, that's very different than longstanding occupation.

The worst thing that can happen is to be able to have this kind of conflict start

and to not end it, to leave it undone.

We've got to be able to finish this. We're a month into the war, and senators in Trump's own party don't know why it's being fought,

don't know the objectives, and yet we're getting ready to put troops in.

It's going to be hard to finish this when nobody knows what they're doing,

and Trump changes mission objectives and victory conditions daily.

That's a recipe for lost troops and a lost war.

Let's run through the menu based on the assets in the region that we know are deployed. Yes, there are assets in region to conduct special operations

of a whole bunch of varieties. Everything from demo jobs to snatching leadership or scientific personnel.

But there's also a list of assets that were moved that aren't needed for special operations.

Those assets suggest potential moves against islands or the coast.

There's the move against Karg Island, which would draw Iranian resources

...