Well, howdy there, internet people it spell again.

So today, we're going to talk about Trump's claim that we need Greenland to counter Russia.

Trump has pushed the idea that the U.S. needs to control Greenland to counter Russia.

And now this idea is showing up in messages and the

comments section. First, as a periodic reminder, the U.S. has military access to Greenland.

We don't have to own the territory to use it. But let's skip over that for a second. Just forget the glaring issue. Let's just do a quick

comparison of some numbers. Stick with me on this one. When comparing two countries, Russia loses

on the number of active duty troops, reservists, tanks, armor, helicopters, fighters, bombers, carriers, paramilitary forces,

ships, IFVs. This list goes on and on without end. Russia does have more military satellites,

though. So here's the twist. I'm not comparing Russia in the U.S. That's ridiculous.

Russia can't even manage Ukraine. I'm comparing Russia versus the Soviet Union. Russia is not the Soviet

Union militarily. Stop pretending like it is. They're a competitor, but they're not a peer.

Besides that, during the Cold War, the Soviet Union had the entire Warsaw Pact with them,

and now many of those countries are part of NATO. Please explain to me how Trump is so weak

he can't counter opposition that is drastically weaker than one the U.S. and NATO has already successfully countered.

Look, I'm sorry your post-apocalyptic dreams of playing in the woods and screaming Wolverines didn't happen.

I'm sure you thought it looked cool in the movies.

But Russia isn't the opposition the Soviets were.

And even they weren't up to it.

As long as the US is with NATO, there's not a risk.

Now if the US were to surrender their superpower status by separating

from NATO, that would change things because we would be weaker, alone, and more ripe for the

...