Well, howdy there, Internet people, it spell again.

So today, we're going to talk about Trump's boat operations, videos, terminology, and discussions.

The ongoing debate and discussion isn't being stifled by Defense Secretary Pete Heggseth refusing to commit to releasing

the video of the second strike to the public.

In fact, it may be spurring the discussion on.

Because while our betters in D.C., who said they'd have the most transparent administration

in history,

are hiding the actions of the U.S. government from the public.

Some in Congress have already seen the video, and they're talking about it.

The top Democrat on the House Armed Services Committee,

Representative Adam Smith of Washington, indicated that the video is completely at odds

with Trump administration's statements, and said, quote,

When they were finally taken out, they weren't trying to flip the boat over.

The boat was clearly incapacitated.

A tiny portion of it remained, capsized, the bow of the boat.

They had no communications device. Certainly they were unarmed. Any claim that the drugs had

somehow survived that attack is hard, hard to really square with what we saw. We also have reports

that the survivors were waving at the drone. Whether to signal for help or

wave off another attack is up for debate. Beyond that, the Republican rhetoric is

undermining the already incredibly shaky legal justification

for the war as a whole. The administration has used a legal justification of stating that these

are CT operations and that those being engaged were narco-terrorists.

...