Well, howdy there, Internet people, it's Bell again.

So today, we're going to talk about Trump, Chess, and Venezuela.

We've got a question and a little history lesson today

that might shed some light on why many analysts are skeptical

of the ultimate success of Trump's Venezuela move.

Here's the question. You've implied that this might not work. I'm looking at Maduro in his

little jumpsuit and cuffs and think it looks like it worked to me. It sure seems like Trump plays chess

while you're playing checkers. What? Do you think

they're going to come try to get him back? Right. Because the leader of the country being

captured means the end of the game. Like it did when we captured Saddam in 2003. See, this isn't a chess game, it's foreign policy,

and the game doesn't end when the king, or king and queen in this case, are captured.

The game goes on. It's not chess.

It's an international poker game, where everybody's cheating. The effects of one

hand being played sometimes don't reveal themselves for quite some time. Here's a little

history lesson. In a recent video, I dropped the name of a cleaning product. It was a reference

to a situation where an oil-rich

country decided to nationalize its oil interests, and the U.S. and U.K. wanted to put a new

person in power, because, hey, we're in the oil business. Sounds familiar, right? History doesn't repeat, but it rhymes so the west did its regime change number

an operation at ajax occurred in 1953 and the u.s got its preferred leader the long-term effects of

that little misadventure weren't really revealed for more than 25 years.

And by the time it was revealed, the embassy had fallen. Then American aircraft and troops fell at Desert 1.

It teed up almost 50 years of tensions, nuclear concerns, and wars.

...