Well, howdy, there internet people, let's bow again.

So, uh, tonight we're going to talk about the President of the United States,

the Commander-in-Chief, a wild, wild allegation, believability, and treason.

At the end of the day, believability is all that matters, to be honest, but we'll get there.

An allegation has surfaced, been made against the President of the United States, that is just wild. It is wild.

It has been called a gross dereliction of duty, gross inaction, cowardice, treason.

Now if you don't know what the allegation is just to clue you in.

It has been reported that the President of the United States received an intelligence assessment months ago,

indicating that Russian intelligence was operating in Afghanistan

and attempting to incentivize attacks against American soldiers,

and that he just looked the other way and responded in no way whatsoever.

Wow.

I know, sounds like treason.

It's not.

I'm gonna go ahead and tell you that now. It's not. I'm going to tell you that now. It's not.

Legally speaking, it's not. The legal definition of treason in the United States is so

narrow that you, I mean you pretty much have to try to commit it.

That's why President Trump's accusation against President Obama is so laughable. This, looking the other way while Americans get hit, that's

not treason under the law. Now in general conversation if somebody could be like that's treasonous

you wouldn't hear an argument for me. But it's not that legally speaking.

Okay, so the allegations have been made. Now what?

People are already manning the battle stations.

...