Well, howdy there internet people? Let's bow again. So today we are going to talk about the New York case and it going first.

And the impacts that's going to have on people's perceptions of the various cases because there are

a lot of commentators who are putting out the idea that it's bad that New York went first.

And that is, for the most part based on the idea

that their case isn't the strongest and the concern that is being expressed is that because maybe this one doesn't go the way people

want it to that it will undermine some of the other cases.

So the message that prompted this, what do you think about what is being said? The idea that Americans will

see all the cases as witch hunts if the New York case fails. Should they have

coordinated? First, let's answer that last question. Should they have coordinated?

Absolutely not. If there was evidence that various prosecutors around the

country actually coordinated their cases against Trump, around the That the idea that they should have like lined up or whatever that's not actually a good idea

as far as the idea that New York going first is bad, it's based on a couple of theories that people have,

first, the New York case is the weakest and when it comes to

that I mean I've expressed that based on what's publicly available I think it's

the weakest.

However, we don't actually know what the evidence is.

It's under seal.

We don't know that it's the weakest.

Based on what's publicly available, it looks like the

weakest. However, what is publicly available is like 1% of what they have so we don't actually know. Now the other

part of this is the idea that they shouldn't have gone first.

Okay, that I mean that's the whole basis of the statement.

...