Well, howdy there, internet people it spell again. So today, we're going to talk about

Republicans getting the DC story wrong again. So we're going to start off with a question

that does a good job of giving the who, what, when, where, and why of the developing news.

And then from there, we're going to dive into the answer, because it's an important lesson

to learn about developing events. Okay, so here's the message. Quote, Bell, I've watched

the channel since you were arguing about a birthday cake from off-screen,

so I know that even though you forego slick graphics and go for a low production vibe,

you've got some of the best sources of any independent channel.

I'm not surprised anymore when what seems like a throwaway line turns out to be

fact. But in your video talking about the DC attack, you listed all the wrong narratives the right

wing pushed. It was the Dems. It was Biden's asylum policy's fault. And then finally, it was Afghans in general. Then you said they

still don't have the story right, but didn't expand on that. It was an out-of-place line.

Now I'm reading the news, and the suspect is a guy linked to a CIA operation in Afghanistan,

who is just a textbook case of PTSD.

And even the Trump administration is admitting it wasn't a vetting issue.

I know you can't really say, but how did you know this was going to end up being the story?

Okay. So just a quick fill in on some details. There are

records of mental health issues going back as far as early 2023. It's also being suggested

that at least one of the main stressors was the death of one of his colleagues from the CIA-backed program

after he was denied asylum. After all of the rhetoric about too many people being granted asylum,

it looks like it might have been a denial that served as at least part of the catalyst. There's

also information about financial stress,

...