Well, howdy there going to know people, it's bow again. So today we're going to talk about the

nomination and the First Amendment. I waited to make this video. This news broke a

while ago and I've just been kind of mulling it over because I was worried that I was overreacting and the more I thought about it the more I realize no I am not overreacting not at all

If you don't know Barrett, who is up for a lifetime appointment on the Supreme Court, was asked to name the five freedoms protected by the First Amendment.

She couldn't.

That's it.

The hearings are over.

That's it. This isn't a little thing. I know some people well it just slipped her mind.

Okay sure let's put this in any other context. You go apply McDonald's and you don't

know that bread is part of a hamburger, you're not going to get the job. You go to be a mechanic

and you don't know that there's a cooling system.

You're not going to get the job.

This is an interview for the highest court in the land,

the sole job of which is to interpret the Constitution.

How can she interpret the Constitution if she doesn't know what's in it?

This isn't an entry-level position where there's on-the-job training. This is a lifetime

appointment to the Supreme Court. She was asked point-blank what what

freedoms the First Amendment protected and she couldn't answer.

She couldn't answer.

And for the record to the talking heads out there, you don't have a right to receive redress. That's not what that says. Even in the

discussion after the question that she failed, the media is not even getting it right. You don't have a right for redress. You have a right to petition for a redress of grievances.

You have the right to ask. You don't have a right to have your problem remedies. That's not what the

...