Well, howdy there internet people, it's Bow again. So today we are going to talk about

the Durham report. We're going to talk about what's in it. We're going to go over

the recommendation. We're going to go over the recommendation.

We're going to just kind of go through it in a little bit more calm manner

than I think most people are going through it. The main question that

people have is really you know is this a nothing burger. No it's not a nothing

burger. It's a burger we've already eaten. If you're

familiar with what was in the Inspector General's report,

it's basically the same thing.

Not a whole lot, groundbreaking new information, kind of really is a rehash.

I mean, there's new little sidelines and stuff like that but nothing major.

The difference between the two is, you know, the IG was like mistakes were made,

but the investigation should have gone forward, paraphrasing, simplifying.

Durham, mistakes were made, shouldn't have gone forward.

They relied too much on raw intelligence or information from sources that they really shouldn't have trusted,

maybe they should have vetted it more. That's pretty much it. If you're looking to simplify it.

Was it the crime of the century?

Quote, did it uncover the crime of the century?

No, of course not. In fact, given that you know after

all of these years and 300 pages, there's not a recommendation to indict anybody in the report.

Not just did not uncover the crime of the century, didn't actually uncover a crime.

No deep state plot, nothing like that.

...