Well, howdy there internet people, let's bow again.

So today we are going to talk about foreign policy and Russia and North Korea and a situation we talked about a few weeks ago

and how things could be different and a good

illustration of why foreign policy and the way different countries pursue it should change.

So a few weeks ago, we talked about how North Korea was in a situation where there were a whole

lot of signals that it was not going to have enough food,

that it wasn't going to be able to feed its people.

And I put out a video saying, hey, I understand the foreign policy concerns and how this might be used

as leverage by the West to get them back to the table and all of this stuff.

But at the end of the day, what needs to be remembered is that these are the farmer in the field,

the worker in the factory, these are the people who aren't going to have food.

They don't have anything to do with the decisions being made in those countries.

Now, the West did not, at least to my knowledge,

I haven't seen anything saying that they tried to use it as leverage. It looks like they didn't do anything.

I can't really see anything tangible in which they tried to alleviate the situation.

But now reporting is coming out that Russia is willing to give them food in exchange for

weapons to be used in Ukraine. So what does going to happen now? Let's assume that North Korea takes this deal. So now weapons transfer from North Korea to Russia to Ukraine.

What does the West have to do now? Has to defeat those weapons? What's more expensive? Food or all of those

expensive products used by the military. It's cheaper to be a good person. It causes

less suffering.

If the world community had stepped up when the signals first started showing and provided food, this still may not be happening.

So now you are going to have prolonged problems because instead of acting in a more cooperative fashion for the sake of humanity,

...