If just thinking about your bills makes you feel confused and disorientated,

like your head is full of Raspberry,

then you need Monzo.

Download your new favorite bank and pay bills from custom pots.

Money never felt like Monzo.

UK residents, Tease and see supply.

Well, howdy there, internet people people let's about again so today we are going to talk

about Republicans being right because they are a whole bunch of Republicans are

absolutely correct when it comes to their interpretation of the

U.S. Constitution in relation to Trump and his claims. And they filed to state their opinion. The court accepted the brief. So quick

recap. In Trump's federal election case, this is the DC case.

He's claiming this wide-ranging criminal immunity, like he's immune from prosecution because he's president or was president, whatever.

Smith obviously opposes this, went to Judge Chutkin.

Judge Chutkin was like, yeah, no, that's not a thing.

It's at the appellate court now.

A group of Republicans who former officials from I believe five

different Republican administrations filed an amicus brief, a friend of the court

brief, meaning they are not directly involved in the case, but they have insight

that they feel is important, and the court agreed to allow them to file it.

The Republicans filed and basically said that agreeing with Trump's claim of this wide-ranging presidential immunity from

criminal prosecution would quote,

Embolden presidents who lose re-election to engage in criminal conduct through

...