Well, howdy there, internet people, let's be able again.

So today, we are going to talk about Ohio and trains and impacts and coverage and why the coverage hasn't been as in depth as people want it to be.

And people rightfully think it should be.

and just kind of run through everything

and take a look at it.

So, if you don't know what I'm talking about, there was a train to ramment in a small

town in Ohio because of circumstances as far as putting it out, there was a fire and it seems like they

kind of just let it burn for a little bit.

There were chemicals on the train.

The initially everybody was focused on one specific chemical. turns out that there are I want to

say at least three more that are also really bad to just have dispersed everywhere

which is what kind of occurred. One of the quotes I said or one of the

quotes I saw said that we nukes a town with chemicals over this train, something to that effect.

Now, the question that most people have is about the environmental impacts, the long-term

environmental impacts and why it's not getting the coverage that it should.

A whole lot of questions about this.

And I started looking into it and I made a couple of calls again a reminder I do not feel well so this isn't super in depth

But what I have been able to kind of determine is that they don't know how bad it's going to be yet.

That is probably the root of the media not covering the future environmental impacts.

You have a general consensus that there are going to be future environmental impacts in soil, water, and air.

The scale and scope of which, it's all over the place.

You look at the worst case scenarios. It's huge like a regional event

...