Well, howdy there, Internet people, it spell again.

So today, we're going to talk about Kelly, Heggseth, Trump, and not playing the game.

So, we got a question, and it's a solid question, because it shows how liberals in the country want to use information and defend

their position rather than simply saying the opposing position is factually wrong when

that's probably the route that needs to be taken okay so here's the message and it's a bit

long so stick with me.

Quote, can you suggest examples in which Trump or Hegsseth, etc., might have arguably

been accused of issuing illegal orders?

In more detail, concerning Trump's insane attacks on Mark Kelly and others, the main defense,

currently being thrown up by the right wingosphere, is that Trump hasn't issued any illegal

orders. Therefore, Kelly and the others have told military members that they should disobey

legal orders. Therefore, sedition, etc., etc.

I understand that this is all just an effort to deflect the discussion away from what Kelly,

etc., actually said, and the justifiability of their actions. But in an effort to talk to relatives, friends,

etc., who listen to this garbage, can you offer us some rhetorical ammunition slash evidence to point

to illegal activities Trump and company have done in this regard.

First, let's break down what's happening.

You know it's deflection, but you want to defend against the deflection.

You know they never told troops to disobey a lawful order and specified unlawful orders,

just like the training troops routinely get says. So why play their game? At its core, this argument is summed up by the misunderstanding of how and why the military

trains the way it does. Imagine somebody saying, well, these troops have never been ambushed, so let's wait until

that happens before we train those who are left how to deal with it. These troops have never

...