Well, howdy there, internet people, let's bea again. So today we are going to talk about Ukraine

and inventory levels and NATO and why some people who provide commentary on this are disinterested in this particular

topic, they're not talking about it and why that is. And then we will talk about what may happen in the future, what the

outcomes may be in relation to something else that is happening over there

right now. You got a message. The three people

I turn to for coverage, blank, blank, and you aren't really talking about how AMO stockpiles are getting lower for NATO and crossing

into numbers that are lower than what they're supposed to maintain.

Is there a reason why?

Also, what are the possible effects of the Russian offensive

and when will it start?

Okay, first question first. You named three people. I don't like speaking

for other people and particularly in this case because there are three different elements to why a commentator might be less than interested in this topic.

And you named three people.

You can infer from that what you will.

Okay, so if you have no idea what this is about.

NATO countries, the U.S. military, they maintain levels, inventory levels, X number of this

type of munition. We've talked about it before on the recommended

recommended level. And before I was kind of debunking it and saying we're not really at that

point yet where it's dipping below the recommended levels. We are now. It's

actually starting to happen now.

Why are some people less than concerned about that?

Okay, so why do those inventory levels exist?

...