Well, howdy there internet people, let's bow again. So today we are going to talk a little bit about the dynamics, some terminology, answers some questions, talk about the term over the top, and why it's being used, and just kind of run

through some of the positions that seem to be changing but they're actually not they're just

becoming more direct in the public statements of the long time positions.

Okay. of the long time positions.

Okay, you have no idea what I'm talking about.

The United States has used the term over the top

to describe Israel's response. Israel's operations were over the top. The question has

come in a bunch. Why are they using that term? Because they don't want to say overreaction.

Overreaction is politically untenable.

It's not a good way to say it.

And saying it that way is a bit too open. Remember when you are talking about small force big

force dynamics the goal of the small force as weird as it sounds, is to provoke the larger force, the

establishment force, into an overreaction.

Saying the response was over the top is saying that Israel played into the hands of

their opposition. That's that's being said with that terminology.

Understand playing into the hands of the opposition generally strengthens the opposition, not weakens it.

Okay, the next thing is the US saying that it's not going to support a move into Raffa. If you don't know, Raffa is the next

stop in the ever expanding creeping mission of Israel in Gaza.

Raffa is a location where there are a whole bunch of people who are already displaced.

The US is saying, we don't support this, don't do this. The question is why?

Because it's going to be the worst mistake and a long string of mistakes.

Remember from the very beginning, U.S. advisors went over there.

...