Well, howdy there internet people, it's Bell again.

So today we're going to talk about how Harris succeeded in showing how easy it would be to manipulate Trump in foreign policy situations. She showcased exactly how foreign leaders

can combine a little bit of psychology and a basic understanding of his

personal drives to make Trump behave in the way that they want him to.

Since the debate happened, we've gotten a lot of messages asking what I personally

thought of her performance.

I wasn't sure I wanted to really answer them at first

because after a debate people like to cheer lead and wishcast. But we've gotten a

lot of questions asking this.

So I'll answer, but in a roundabout way that not only gives you my personal opinion of her performance,

but also provide some important context as to why Trump was so bad at foreign policy.

Prior to the debate, I put a video talking about what Harris should do during the debate,

and then another talking about how she was clearly attempting

to execute that strategy because of an ad she put out.

Those videos outline what I saw is her best possible strategy and

they went out before the debate. So it's not cheerleading or wishcasting when I

say that's exactly what she did.

Write down to teeing him up by mentioning his previous staff who no longer support him.

The strategy outlined in the videos, which will be down below, was relatively simple.

Play into his paranoia and make him think the moderators are on her side, and poke at him about things that will make him lash out.

Here's the thing that it showcases about Trump in a foreign policy situation.

Harris shook him in an easily predictable way.

...