Well, howdy there, internet people, let's bow again.

So today we're going to talk about George Santos and who's at fault?

Because that's a discussion that is taking place in a lot of

corners in the United States right now who is really the entity that should shoulder the responsibility for what

happened. Now if you don't know what occurred, a candidate who won their election in New York has since

been found to have provided a little bit of fiction with their background.

They creatively interpreted some things.

Like pretty much everything.

There are actually so many allegations now I can't even

keep track of them all. Everything from educational background to where they worked to

heritage. I mean everything.

Some of it is normal padding of a resume.

Some of it isn't.

So this person won their election. The election's over. They won. And the discussion that's

taking place is because it's the United States, you know,

who to blame? Who to blame? The two candidates being offered up to accept the responsibility are the Democratic Party or the media.

Santos is a Republican, but the Democratic Party by this argument should have engaged in

basic opposition research and they would have uncovered this. Yes and no.

They would have uncovered a lot of it. Some of this is outside the scope of normal basic opposition research.

But some of it certainly would have been uncovered if they had done that.

The other candidate is the media.

The local media should have investigated somebody who is running for public office in a position of trust,

...