This is an IHeart podcast.

KFI AM 640.

You're listening to the John Cobel podcast on the IHeart Radio app.

We are on.

We're back in all together.

Every day from 1 until 4 o'clock.

And after 4 o'clock, if you miss stuff, you go to John Cobalt Show On Demand, also on the I-Hard app.

All right, we open the show by talking about the Trump administration losing around in court.

Happens frequently and frequently gets reversed.

So this is about a district judge, Charles Breyer.

He said that Trump cannot use the military and send it to cities and states that we do not have a national police force with the president

as its chief. It violates something called the Pasi-Kamatatus Act, which is supposed to keep the military

out of civilian law enforcement. However, Breyer is the guy who said that Trump couldn't really control

the National Guard. That was up to Newsom. And Breyer was overruled by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. So which way is this one going to go? Let's get Royal Oaks on, the ABC News legal analyst. Royale, how are you? I'm doing great, John, and yeah, I think you put your finger on the key here. It's one thing for Judge Breyer, the trial court judge up in San Francisco to say, hey, Donald Trump,

you blew it, you had no legal right to bring in troops. But the Ninth Circuit gets the final word,

unless the Supreme Court takes it up. And as you point out, back in June, when this thing happened,

you know, people were thinking, I've heard this, I've seen this movie before, the Ninth Circuit,

even though one of the three panelists

was an Obama appointee, she agreed with the conservative judges.

You know, the president has a lot of discretion, and as a result, no temporary restraining

order then, but now he's issued a preliminary injunction, and it could meet the same fate

as it met in June.

...