The following podcast contains advertising.

To access an ad-free version of the Lawfair Podcast,

become a material supporter of Lawfair at Patreon.com slash Lawfair.

That's Patreon.

dot com slash Lawfair.

Also, check out Lawfair's other podcast offerings. rational security, chatter, lawfare no bull, and the

aftermath.

Want to transform your career with skills that will keep pace with change?

At PWC, we've been helping clients navigate disruption for 175 years

and as challenges have changed so have we in the past year we've

set up 15,000 of our UK team with Gen AI skills and tools. So be transformative,

join our human-led tech-powered team at PWC.co.uk

forward slash careers. She's taking these arguments very seriously, but she at the same time, I think ultimately

seemed to be leaning towards some skepticism

about trumps, our argument that these charges should be dismissed.

It's the lawfare Podcast, Trumps, Trials and Tribulations. I'm Benjamin Wittis, Law Fair's Editor-in-Chief,

with Anna Bauer, Law Fair Legal Fellow and Courts Correspondent, Lee Kavarski,

Law Professor at the University of Texas, and Marty Liederman, a law professor at Georgetown Law.

So I am definitely a contrarian here, I guess, at least among the folks that you were referring to Ben. I don't think there's anything

particularly out of the ordinary in the way the Supreme Court has handled the immunity case.

In a live recording on June 21st we talked about the Friday hearing on the legality of Jack Smith's appointment in the classified documents case in South Florida,

the appellate issues at hand in Trump's New York case, and much, much more. And honestly, I don't think that there's a scalpel sharp enough for the Supreme Court to make the cuts that it would need to make in order to avoid severing that artery with blood everywhere.

...